| |
|
|
|
|
Natural History Photographs
by Cor Zonneveld
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some thoughts about variation in the colours of Butterflies
|
|
Butterflies differ in color. This is trivially true if one compares different species, but it is non-trivially
true within a species. Within an individual's life span, within a population, between spring and summer generation,
between different geographic areas: variation in coloration is rife. In this page I give examples of the
multifarious ways in which variation in coloration can be observed.
The various forms of color variation can be conceptualized as arising from two sources: space and time.
Two butterflies can be near or far in space and time. Defining the differences in space and time means
defining the sources of variation. I'll show some examples from various combinations of near by and
far away in space as well as in time.
|
|
Variation within an individual's lifetime
|
|
If distance is zero, while time varies only slightly one deals with variation in the lifetime of a single individual.
Don't underestimate this source: it can cause dramatic variation indeed. Here are some examples.
|
|
The Painted Lady, Vanessa cardui
|
|
|
|
|
Top row: When fresh, that is, when just eclosed from the pupa, the Painted Lady has
a salmon glow about it, especially the underside of the forewings.
Bottom row: The pigments causing this pink shade tend to become dull with long exposure to air.
The specimen left already lacks the fine colors of fresh specimens;
the right specimen has lost not only color, but also wing...
|
Zerynthia rumina. Left is a nice fresh specimen, but the one on the right is an old lady or gent.
Its wings have become translucent, because most yellow scales are lost.
|
|
|
|
Small Tortoiseshell, Aglais urticae. Left is a nice fresh specimen, eclosed in September.
They hibernate as adults and re-emerge in spring; the right photograph shows a hibernated adult feeding
on willow catkins. Pigmental colors fade during this long period; the yellows have bleached considerably.
Combined with the usual wear and tear the Tortoiseshell gets a much more shabby appearance.
|
|
Variation between individuals within populations
|
If both spatial and temporal distance are nonzero but small, the situation indicated is the population within one generation.
The additional source of variation is between individuals when they eclose. In some species this source is rather small.
For instance, Red Admirals (Vanessa atalanta) may differ in size, but their color pattern is remarkably stable.
|

|
|
The most obvious interindividual variation is in the color of the red band, but most of this variation is due to the previous source -
that is, to wear and tear.
But the Red Admiral is rather uncharacteristic as regards variation.
In many species, there is a at least one major source of variation: sex.
|
|
Males and Females
|
|
Males and females may differ in coloration very much indeed. If they do, a species is said to be
sexually dimorphic. Sexual dimorphy can be totally absent, as in the genera Nymphalis and Vanessa.
It may be present but not pronounced, as in in many species. But it can be very pronounced indeed, as in many blues.
Here are some examples of more pronounced sexual dimorphy.
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
|
Black-veined white, Aporia crataegi.
|
|
|
Lycaena virgaurea montana
|
|
|
Adonis Blue, Polyommatus bellargus
|
|
|
|
Purple Emperor, Apatura iris. The female lacks the reflection colors.
|
|
Within population phenotypic variation
|
|
In general, most individuals within a population differ in there genetic make-up, as well as in the environmental conditions
they were exposed to during development. As a result, they do not all look the same. The technical term for this is phenotipc variation.
There is hardly a limit to this, but extreme aberrations are rare. Aberrations tend to be discontinous forms of variation.
The more common variation tends to be gradual. Here are some examples.
|
Green-veined White, Pieris napi. Summer generation.
|
Both whites are from the summer generation. They are from Austria and Amsterdam, so definitely not from the same population.
However, such variation can certainly be seen within the same population! The form on the left panel is so different that is
got its own name: forma napaea. It's so unlike 'typical' napi that you may even mistake it for rapae;
an error I've even seen in a popular book on butterflies!
|
Small Copper, Lycaena phlaeas forma caeruleopunctata
|
These two specimens show two kinds of variation. First, although they both have blue
spots above the orange band of the hind-wing, these are much better developed in the left specimen.
Second, the spots on the fore-wing differ substantially in size. Those in the left specimen
are very small indeed, while those in the right specimen are quite big. The Small Copper is
a quite variable species; see a page of the
Natural History Museum for an overview of many forms.
|
Duke of Burgundy Fritillary, Hamearis lucina
|
This butterfly is orange with brown - or is it brown with orange? Probably the difference is only semantic: what is figure,
what ground? The right specimen is particularly orange, the left one is more typical.
In many species dark scales may suffuse the ground color. This mostly occurs as an expression of geographical variation,
affecting entire populations. But these two specimens were photographed close together (Torla, Spain; May 1982), showing
that it also is an aspect of intra-population variation.
|
|
A species known for its rich variability is the Marsh Fritillary, Euphydryas aurinia.
Look for the 10 differences in the photo's below! Hints: look at the black spots in the marginal
band on the hind wing; the boldness of the black markings; the contrast between yellow and orange; etc.
|
|
The Marsh Fritillary, Euphydryas aurinia
|
|
|
|
|
Aberrations
|
|
As stated above, aberrations tend to be discontinous forms of variation. There is no clear cut difference between a variation and
an aberration. The Small Coppers shown above, with blue spots, is described as an aberration, but I found it to be a very common
variation. It may be present to some degree in over half of the butterflies in a population. That sounds not very aberrant, and
therfore I used the term forma instead of aberration.
But there are many variations that may really count as aberrations, because (i) they differ substantially from most other
specimens in a population, and (ii) there are no intermediates between the normal type and the aberration, and (iii) they are
very rare. For example, I've seen thousands of Red Admirals, but there were only two aberrations among these.
Although any particular aberration is generally very rare indeed, there are so many of them that one certainly has the
possibility to observe some aberration every now and then. Some are recurrent forms, and many have been named. On pages of the
Natural History Museum you can look for
photographs of pinned specimens. Not the real thing, but very informative none the less. These pages also show many aberrations.
|
|
Brimstone, Gonepteryx rhamni
|
|
|
Normal form on the left, unnamed aberration on the right.
|
|
The Silver-studded Blue, Plebejus argus
|
|
|
Unnamed aberration.
|
|
Variation between generations within populations
|
|
Some butterfly species fly in only one generation per year. But many others, especially the smaller ones, fly at different
times of the year, for instance in spring and during the summer. This means that the larvae and pupae develop under different
conditions. Especially the weather will make a difference, but there are also other differences. Day length varies very predictable,
and may act as a cue to base developmental decisions on. Food quality may also be different. Since environmental conditions
might affect development, butterflies of different generations might show different colors. The technical term for different colors
in different generations is seasonal dimorphy.
|
|
The Wood White, Leptidea sinapis
|
|
|
Spring generation on the left, summer generation on the right. The absence of dark
markings in the summer specimen may be quite extreme. Both pictures taken in the same area, see
habitat.
|
|
The Comma, Polygonia c-album
|
|
|
The voltinism (i.e., number of generations) of the Comma is slightly complex. They hibernate
as adults, and it is always the dark form shown left that hibernates. The hibernater's offspring may develop into adult butterflies
that reproduce in the same year; these adults are or the lightly colored form on the right. Alternatively, they may develop into
adults that hibernate before reproducing. Such butterflies are of the dark form. The offspring of the light form produces dark
butterflies that always hibernate.
On top of this intergenerational variation comes sexual dimorphism. The two photographs below show a female (left) and a male (right)
of the overwintering generation.
|
|
|
|
The Map butterfly, Araschnia levana
|
|
|
Spring generation on the left, summer generation on the right. The most extreme case
of seasonal dimorphy in European butterflies. Linnaeus even ranked the two forms as different species!
|
|
Quite often butterflies in different geographic areas are different from each other. Although two individuals from
different populations may occasionaly still show a strong semblance, the populations as a whole can still be different.
If this is the case, the populations show signs of geographic variation.
Geographic variation is due to variation in space rather than in time. However, it is invariably confounded with
other sources of variation. One always has to account for intra-individual variation (the first source mentioned on this page).
Moreover, different geographic regions vary in climate, affecting the timing of generations. Other environmental qualities
most likey also differ. As a result, the populations may have genetically adapted to their local environment. If so,
the genetic difference is an important cause of variation. Here is a typical example of the confounded nature of geographical
variation:
|
|
The Scarce Swallowtail, Iphiclides podalirius
|
|
|
|
|
Ronda, Spain; April 1982.
|
Jaca, Spain; May 1982.
|
Montagne du Luberon, France; June 1990.
|
|
There's much intra-individual variation here. One butterfly has lost one tail, one has lost half of both its tails.
The Jaca specimen is fresh, the Ronda specimen already worn, the Luberon specimen is heavily worn indeed. They are
all from the first generation, flying at different times due to climatic differences. On top of this there is geographic
variation. The Iberian butterflies have a more whitish ground color, those north of the Pyrenean Mountains a more yellowish
one. This is hard to see in these photographs due to differences in wear in tear. Another difference is that the Iberian
specimens have broader black stripes, as can be observed here too.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|